if our application is going to cause an issue in your alliance, i would of thought we'd retract our application (have to speak with the other's 1st tho) as i am not the guild's spoke person, we leave that to georgie as he is the most edumacated out of all of us. our guild is 6 friends who have played daoc and numerous other online games together.i admit i came up with the name and tbh, i havent a clue from where it sprung from but were not angry, well except tay when i aoe amneisa the fg albs running past when they havent noticed us , then things can get blue on teamspeak .
hope to hear from u soon
take care.
Please don't do that. Someone was just letting off a little steam about something totally different, and he didn't mean it. Absolutely nothing to do with you, and would be a great shame if you withdraw your application because of it.
I still think there has to be a hidden story about why the squirrels are angry....
Has Banana done an angry squirrel smilie for you yet?
it's okay, we aren't going to detract the application, i just offered it up as an alternative to stop this argument from escalating, i sometimes write stuff without thinking sometime's , will get told of and scalded later by georgie no doubt (sometimes wonder if i sublimaly like this!).
Majty wrote:Okay, Fair enough about the part that you play Ilves now, However, you have never been intrested in any GM actions before as Ilves, It seems to me that you only used him now to get the chance to veto for yourself. Because this was your desecion not a guild desecion.
we a 2 man guild m8 with 2 gms pls think before you post
and i was in gm meetings with levelnix not often but
this wasn t necessary till now
Touchy wrote:if our application is going to cause an issue in your alliance, i would of thought we'd retract our application
As soon as this thread got hit by the overflow i sent a message to your GM's and they are both aware of the situation and hopefully not retrating the application.
Alex not sure what you ment by the AB comment either, as far as i know they are in the 'active but very small' grouping of guilds and were not amounst thoose proposed in the guild purge on sunday.
levelnix wrote:we a 2 man guild m8 with 2 gms pls think before you post
and i was in gm meetings with levelnix not often but
this wasn t necessary till now
I have read all your post regarding this matter, and you are telling ME to think before I post, i find that pretty funny.
Aran_Thule wrote:As soon as this thread got hit by the overflow i sent a message to your GM's and they are both aware of the situation and hopefully not retrating the application.
Alex not sure what you ment by the AB comment either, as far as i know they are in the 'active but very small' grouping of guilds and were not amounst thoose proposed in the guild purge on sunday.
can explain it
ab was a short time only me (ilves) and alex till majty was coming back
btw alex also started in ab so he has insider knowledge
atm we 3 player in ab 2 active me and majty and sometimes krey
looks in too thats the ab situation atm
levelnix wrote:can explain it
ab was a short time only me (ilves) and alex till majty was coming back
btw alex also started in ab so he has insider knowledge
atm we 3 player in ab 2 active me and majty and sometimes krey
looks in too thats the ab situation atm
Aha.. then I know what you talk about, But when was I coming back? It was like 2 years ago , And as far as i know, it was still no talk about removing AB from the alliance then, but who knows i might have missed it, Not that it matters now
Majty wrote:Aha.. then I know what you talk about, But when was I coming back? It was like 2 years ago , And as far as i know, it was still no talk about removing AB from the alliance then, but who knows i might have missed it, Not that it matters now
noone want s to remove ab from ally and i m happy about that
to fix this was 1 of the reasons i joined sundays gm meeting
also i m still happy that you in guild with me m8
, then things can get blue on teamspeak
